Charities Act 1993 (c.10)U.K.
7. For section 68 of the Charities Act 1993 M1 (status to appear on correspondence etc) substitute—
“68. Requirement to disclose charitable status
(1) Where a company is a charity and its name does not include the word “charity” or “charitable”, the fact that the company is a charity must be stated in legible characters—
(a)in every location, and in every description of document or communication, in which it is required by regulations under section 82 of the Companies Act 2006 to state its registered name, and
(b)in all conveyances purporting to be executed by the company.
(2) Where a company's name includes the word “elusen” or “elusennol” (the Welsh equivalents of “charity” and “charitable”), subsection (1) does not apply in relation to any document that is wholly in Welsh.
(3) The statement required by subsection (1) must be in English, except that, in the case of a document that is otherwise wholly in Welsh, the statement may be in Welsh if it consists of or includes the word “elusen” or “elusennol”.
(4) In subsection (1)(b) “conveyance” means any instrument creating, transferring, varying or extinguishing an interest in land.
68ZA. Civil consequences of failure to make required disclosure
(1) This section applies to any legal proceedings brought by a company to which section 68 applies to enforce a right arising out of a contract or conveyance in connection with which there was a failure to comply with that section.
(2) The proceedings shall be dismissed if the defendant to the proceedings shows—
(a)that he has a claim against the claimant arising out of the contract or conveyance that he has been unable to pursue by reason of the latter's failure to comply with section 68, or
(b)that he has suffered some financial loss in connection with the contract or conveyance by reason of the claimant's failure to comply with that section,
unless the court before which the proceedings are brought is satisfied that it is just and equitable to permit the proceedings to continue.
(3) This section does not affect the right of any person to enforce such rights as he may have against another person in any proceedings brought by that person.
68ZB. Criminal consequences of failure to make required disclosure
(1) Where a company fails, without reasonable excuse, to comply with section 68, an offence is committed by—
(a)the company, and
(b)every officer of the company who is in default.
(2) For this purpose a shadow director of the company is treated as an officer of the company if the failure is to comply with section 68(1)(a) and that person would be treated as an officer of the company for the purposes of the corresponding requirement of regulations under section 82 of the Companies Act 2006.
(3) A person guilty of such an offence is liable on summary conviction to a fine not exceeding level 3 on the standard scale and, for continued contravention, a daily default fine not exceeding one-tenth of level 3 on the standard scale.
(4) Expressions used in this section have the same meaning as in section 84 of the Companies Act 2006 (criminal consequences of failure to disclose company's registered name).”.