23. In article 29—
(a)for paragraph (1)(c) substitute—
“(c)a litigator is dissatisfied with—
(i)the calculation by the appropriate officer of the fee payable to the litigator in accordance with Schedule 2; or
(ii)the decision of the appropriate officer under paragraph 3(3) of Schedule 2 (reclassification of an offence not specifically listed in the relevant Table of Offences and so deemed to fall within Class H);”;
(b)for paragraph (2) substitute—
“(2) An application under paragraph (1) may not challenge the quantum of any of the fees set out in Schedule 1 and Schedule 2.”;
(c)in paragraph (3)(a) omit “notification of”;
(d)omit paragraph (7)(b).