GUIDANCE ON INTERVENTION CRITERIA FOR ENGLAND
2.Section 17 of the Act requires a local traffic authority...
3.Section 19 empowers the Secretary of State to direct an...
6.The intervention notice is the first formal stage in the...
8.In November 2004 the Secretary of State for Transport published...
12.It is hoped that the potential for intervention will encourage...
14.Under the Act, it is for individual authorities to determine...
16.Each authority should aim to show that their approach to...
17.In terms of priorities for keeping the network moving efficiently,...
20.Moreover, it is not always possible to identify direct links...
22.However, the Act indicates that authorities may take any action...
24.The Secretary of State will expect to see evidence, within...
25.DEMONSTRATING THE PERFORMANCE OF THE NETWORK MANAGEMENT DUTIES
26.An authority should report on how they are managing their...
27.It is intended that any reporting process should not impose...
28.It is the responsibility of each authority to provide clear...
29.Where authorities participate in a joint LTP, each should ensure...
31.Transport for London is a local traffic authority and should...
32.As intervention powers rest with the Secretary of State rather...
34.TO WHAT EXTENT HAVE AN AUTHORITY HAD REGARD FOR THE NETWORK MANAGEMENT DUTY GUIDANCE IN PERFORMING THEIR NETWORK MANAGEMENT DUTIES? (See section 18(2) of the Act)
35.Considering the needs of all road users. (See NMDG paragraphs 26, 51, 87-90 and 128)
36.Coordinating and planning works and known events. (See NMDG paragraph 27)
37.Gathering information and providing information needs. (See NMDG paragraphs 28, 100, 101, 137 and 138)
38.Incident management and contingency planning. (See NMDG paragraphs 29 and 50)
40.Working with all stakeholders - internal and external. (See the Act and NMDG paragraphs 31 to 33 and 57 to 63)
41.Ensuring parity with others. (See NMDG paragraphs 68 and 99)
42.Providing evidence to demonstrate network management. (See NMDG paragraph 47)
43.TO WHAT EXTENT HAVE THE AUTHORITY CONSIDERED AND WHERE APPROPRIATE TAKEN ACTION AS ENVISAGED BY SECTION 16(2) OF THE ACT?
44.TO WHAT EXTENT HAVE THE AUTHORITY EXERCISED ANY POWER IN SUPPORT OF THIS ACTION?
45.TO WHAT EXTENT HAVE INDICATORS BEEN ADOPTED AND TARGETS TO REDUCE CONGESTION BEEN MET?
46.TO WHAT EXTENT DO INDIVIDUAL CIRCUMSTANCES ACCOUNT FOR AN APPARENT FAILURE OF A DUTY?
48.While the informal approach will probably be the main method...
50.CONSULTATION BEFORE GIVING AN INTERVENTION NOTICE OR MAKING AN INTERVENTION ORDER
51.CRITERIA FOR DECIDING WHETHER TO GIVE AN INTERVENTION NOTICE
53.In applying this criterion, the Secretary of State will address...
54.CRITERION No.2 (Section 16 - the network management duty)
55.In applying this criterion the Secretary of State will address...
56.CRITERIA FOR DECIDING WHETHER TO MAKE AN INTERVENTION ORDER
58.In applying this criterion, the Secretary of State will re-address...
59.CRITERION No.4 (Section 16 - the network management duty)
60.In applying this criterion the Secretary of State will re-address...