Act of Sederunt (Rules of the Court of Session Amendment) (Optional Procedure and Miscellaneous) 1992

Citation and commencement

1.—(1) This Act of Sederunt may be cited as the Act of Sederunt (Rules of the Court of Session Amendment) (Optional Procedure and Miscellaneous) 1992 and shall come into force on 10th February 1992.

(2) This Act of Sederunt shall be inserted in the Books of Sederunt.

Amendment of the Rules of the Court of Session

2.—(1) The Rules of the Court of Session(1) shall be amended in accordance with the following sub-paragraphs.

(2) In rule 74(g) (application for recall of diligence before calling)(2), for the words from “The solicitors for the parties” to the word “signet”, substitute the following words:—

• “The clerk shall be accompanied by counsel, solicitor or both counsel and solicitor for each party. The solicitor or counsel for the pursuer shall produce to the Lord Ordinary the principal summons bearing the signet.”.

(3) In rule 95(a) (application for commission and diligence for recovery of documents), for the words from “The applicant’s solicitor” to the words “shall also appear”, substitute the following words:—

• “The clerk shall be accompanied by counsel or solicitor or both counsel and solicitor for the applicant and for any party who wishes to oppose the application and for the Lord Advocate if he wishes to oppose the application. The solicitor or counsel for the applicant shall produce to the Lord Ordinary the principal summons bearing the signet.”.

(4) In rule 95A(a) (application for order under section 1 of the Administration of Justice (Scotland) Act 1972)(3), for the words from “The applicant’s solicitor” to the words “shall also appear”, substitute the following words:—

• “The clerk shall be accompanied by counsel or solicitor or both counsel and solicitor for the applicant and for any party who wishes to oppose the application and for the Lord Advocate if he wishes to oppose the application. The solicitor or counsel for the applicant shall produce to the Lord Ordinary the principal summons bearing the signet.”.

(5) In rule 188J (diet roll)(4)—

(a) in paragraph (4) after the word “motions”, insert the words “(other than an applic ation for commission and diligence for the recovery of medical records heard before the first hearing on the Diet Roll)”;

(b) in sub-paragraph (6)(a)(ii) after the word “amendment”, insert the words “to the instance or conclusions of the summons”; and

(c) after sub-paragraph (6)(c), insert the following sub-paragraph:—

“(d) where the court appoints the action to a proof or a proof before answer on the question of liability and quantum of damages it may separate the proof on the question of liability from the proof on quantum of damages.”.

(6) In rule 188K (inspection and recovery of documents)(5), for paragraph (1) substitute the following paragraph—

“(1) Without prejudice to rule 188M, within 14 days of the interlocutor pronouncing an order for a proof or proof before answer, each party to the action shall intimate to every other party and lodge in process—

(a) a list of the documents which are, or to the best of his knowledge have been, in his possession or control relating to the matters in issue between them;

(b) a note stating the whereabouts so far as known to him of any such documents which have been but are no longer in his possession.”

(7) In rule 188L (exhange of list of witnesses)(6), in paragraph (1) after the word “party” where it second occurs, insert the words “and lodge in process”.

(8) In the Appendix, in Form 27A(7) in the second article of Condescendence marked “[IV]” after the word “sustained”, insert the words “; and specify every medical practitioner from whom, and hospital or other institution in which, the pursuer or the deceased received treatment in respect of the injuries or disease to which the action relates”.

Revocation

3.  In the Act of Sederunt (Rules of the Court of Session Amendment No. 10) (Miscellaneous) 1991(8), in paragraph 2—

(a) sub-paragraph (6),

(b) sub-paragraph (14),

(c) sub-paragraph (30)(c) and (e),

are revoked.

J.A.D. Hope

Lord President, IPD

Edinburgh,

16th January 1992