(1)A bulk equipment interference warrant ceases to have effect at the end of the relevant period (see subsection (2)), unless—
(a)it is renewed before the end of that period (see section 185), or
(b)it is cancelled or otherwise ceases to have effect before the end of that period (see sections 180 and 189).
(2)In this section, “the relevant period”—
(a)in the case of an urgent warrant (see subsection (3)), means the period ending with the fifth working day after the day on which the warrant was issued;
(b)in any other case, means the period of 6 months beginning with—
(i)the day on which the warrant was issued, or
(ii)in the case of a warrant which has been renewed, the day after the day at the end of which the warrant would have ceased to have effect if it had not been renewed.
(3)For the purposes of subsection (2)(a), a warrant is an “urgent warrant” if—
(a)the warrant was issued without the approval of a Judicial Commissioner, and
(b)the person who decided to issue the warrant considered that there was an urgent need to issue it.
(1)If the renewal conditions are met, a bulk equipment interference warrant may be renewed, at any time during the renewal period, by an instrument issued by the Secretary of State.
This is subject to subsection (6).
(2)The renewal conditions are—
(a)that the Secretary of State considers that the warrant continues to be necessary—
(i)in the interests of national security, or
(ii)on that ground and on any other grounds falling within section 178(2),
(b)that the Secretary of State considers that the conduct that would be authorised by the renewed warrant continues to be proportionate to what is sought to be achieved by that conduct,
(c)that the Secretary of State considers that—
(i)each of the specified operational purposes (see section 183) is a purpose for which the examination of material obtained under the warrant continues to be, or may be, necessary, and
(ii)the examination of such material for each such purpose continues to be necessary on any of the grounds on which the Secretary of State considers that the warrant continues to be necessary, and
(d)that the decision to renew the warrant has been approved by a Judicial Commissioner.
(3)“The renewal period” means—
(a)in the case of an urgent warrant which has not been renewed, the relevant period;
(b)in any other case, the period of 30 days ending with the day at the end of which the warrant would otherwise cease to have effect.
(4)The decision to renew a bulk equipment interference warrant must be taken personally by the Secretary of State, and the instrument renewing the warrant must be signed by the Secretary of State.
(5)Section 179 (approval of warrants by Judicial Commissioners) applies in relation to a decision to renew a bulk equipment interference warrant as it applies in relation to a decision to issue a bulk equipment interference warrant.
This is subject to subsection (6).
(6)In the case of a bulk equipment interference warrant which has been modified so that it no longer authorises or requires the securing of interference with any equipment or the obtaining of any communications, equipment data or other information—
(a)the renewal condition in subsection (2)(a) is to be disregarded,
(b)the reference in subsection (2)(c)(ii) to the grounds on which the Secretary of State considers the warrant to be necessary is to be read as a reference to any grounds falling within section 178(1)(b) or (2), and
(c)section 179 has effect as if—
(i)paragraph (a) of subsection (1) were omitted, and
(ii)the reference in subsection (1)(c)(ii) to the grounds on which the Secretary of State considers the warrant to be necessary were a reference to any grounds falling within section 178(1)(b) or (2).
(7)In this section—
“the relevant period” has the same meaning as in section 184;
“urgent warrant” is to be read in accordance with subsection (3) of that section.
(1)The provisions of a bulk equipment interference warrant may be modified at any time by an instrument issued by the person making the modification.
(2)The modifications which may be made under this section are—
(a)adding, varying or removing any operational purpose specified in the warrant as a purpose for which any material obtained under the warrant may be selected for examination, and
(b)adding, varying or removing any description of conduct authorised by the warrant.
(3)In this section—
(a)a modification adding or varying any operational purpose, or any description of conduct, as mentioned in subsection (2) is referred to as a “major modification”, and
(b)any other modification within that subsection is referred to as a “minor modification”.
(4)A major modification adding or varying any operational purpose—
(a)must be made by the Secretary of State, and
(b)may be made only if the Secretary of State considers that it is necessary on any of the grounds on which the Secretary of State considers the warrant to be necessary (see section 178(1)(b)).
(5)A major modification adding or varying any description of conduct—
(a)must be made by the Secretary of State, and
(b)may be made only if the Secretary of State considers—
(i)that the modification is necessary on any of the grounds on which the Secretary of State considers the warrant to be necessary (see section 178(1)(b)), and
(ii)that the conduct authorised by the modification is proportionate to what is sought to be achieved by that conduct.
(6)Except where the Secretary of State considers that there is an urgent need to make the modification, a major modification has effect only if the decision to make the modification is approved by a Judicial Commissioner.
(7)A minor modification may be made by—
(a)the Secretary of State, or
(b)a senior official acting on behalf of the Secretary of State.
(8)Where a minor modification is made by a senior official, the Secretary of State must be notified personally of the modification and the reasons for making it.
(9)If at any time a person mentioned in subsection (7) considers that any operational purpose specified in a warrant is no longer a purpose for which the examination of material obtained under the warrant is or may be necessary, the person must modify the warrant by removing that operational purpose.
(10)The decision to modify the provisions of a warrant must be taken personally by the person making the modification, and the instrument making the modification must be signed by that person.
This is subject to subsection (11).
(11)If it is not reasonably practicable for an instrument making a major modification to be signed by the Secretary of State, the instrument may be signed by a senior official designated by the Secretary of State for that purpose.
(12)In such a case, the instrument making the modification must contain a statement that—
(a)it is not reasonably practicable for the instrument to be signed by the Secretary of State, and
(b)the Secretary of State has personally and expressly authorised the making of the modification.
(13)Despite section 176(1)(b) and (4)(a), the modification of a bulk equipment interference warrant so that it no longer authorises or requires the securing of interference with any equipment or the obtaining of any communications, equipment data or other information does not prevent the warrant from being a bulk equipment interference warrant.
(14)Nothing in this section applies in relation to modifying the provisions of a warrant in a way which does not affect the conduct authorised by it.
(1)In deciding whether to approve a decision to make a major modification of a bulk equipment interference warrant, a Judicial Commissioner must review the Secretary of State’s conclusions as to the following matters—
(a)whether the modification is necessary on any of the grounds on which the Secretary of State considers the warrant to be necessary, and
(b)in the case of a major modification adding or varying any description of conduct authorised by the warrant, whether the conduct authorised by the modification is proportionate to what is sought to be achieved by that conduct.
(2)In doing so, the Judicial Commissioner must—
(a)apply the same principles as would be applied by a court on an application for judicial review, and
(b)consider the matters referred to in subsection (1) with a sufficient degree of care as to ensure that the Judicial Commissioner complies with the duties imposed by section 2 (general duties in relation to privacy).
(3)Where a Judicial Commissioner refuses to approve a decision to make a major modification under section 186, the Judicial Commissioner must give the Secretary of State written reasons for the refusal.
(4)Where a Judicial Commissioner, other than the Investigatory Powers Commissioner, refuses to approve a decision to make a major modification under section 186, the Secretary of State may ask the Investigatory Powers Commissioner to decide whether to approve the decision to make the modification.
(1)This section applies where—
(a)the Secretary of State makes a major modification of a bulk equipment interference warrant without the approval of a Judicial Commissioner, and
(b)the Secretary of State considered that there was an urgent need to make the modification.
(2)The Secretary of State must inform a Judicial Commissioner that the modification has been made.
(3)The Judicial Commissioner must, before the end of the relevant period—
(a)decide whether to approve the decision to make the modification, and
(b)notify the Secretary of State of the Judicial Commissioner’s decision.
“The relevant period” means the period ending with the third working day after the day on which the modification was made.
(4)If the Judicial Commissioner refuses to approve the decision to make the modification—
(a)the warrant (unless it no longer has effect) has effect as if the modification had not been made, and
(b)the person to whom the warrant is addressed must, so far as is reasonably practicable, secure that anything in the process of being done under the warrant by virtue of that modification stops as soon as possible,
and section 187(4) does not apply in relation to the refusal to approve the decision.
(5)The Judicial Commissioner may authorise further interference with equipment for the purpose of enabling the person to whom the warrant is addressed to secure that anything in the process of being done under the warrant by virtue of the modification stops as soon as possible.
(6)Nothing in this section affects the lawfulness of—
(a)anything done under the warrant by virtue of the modification before the modification ceases to have effect;
(b)if anything is in the process of being done under the warrant by virtue of the modification when the modification ceases to have effect—
(i)anything done before that thing could be stopped, or
(ii)anything done which it is not reasonably practicable to stop.
(1)The Secretary of State, or a senior official acting on behalf of the Secretary of State, may cancel a bulk equipment interference warrant at any time.
(2)If the Secretary of State, or a senior official acting on behalf of the Secretary of State, considers that any of the cancellation conditions are met in relation to a bulk equipment interference warrant, the person must cancel the warrant.
(3)The cancellation conditions are—
(a)that the warrant is no longer necessary in the interests of national security;
(b)that the conduct authorised by the warrant is no longer proportionate to what is sought to be achieved by that conduct;
(c)that the examination of material obtained under the warrant is no longer necessary for any of the specified operational purposes (see section 183).
(4)But the condition in subsection (3)(a) does not apply where the warrant has been modified so that it no longer authorises or requires the securing of interference with any equipment or the obtaining of any communications, equipment data or other information.
(5)Where a warrant is cancelled under this section, the person to whom the warrant was addressed must, so far as is reasonably practicable, secure that anything in the process of being done under the warrant stops as soon as possible.
(6)A warrant that has been cancelled under this section may not be renewed.