Search Legislation

Deregulation Act 2015

Repeal of provision for authorisation of insolvency practitioners to be granted by competent authority

594.Paragraph 21 repeals sections 392 to 398 of, and Schedule 7 to, the Insolvency Act 1986 which provide for a competent authority to grant, refuse and withdraw authorisation to act as an insolvency practitioner. As no other competent authority has been designated, the Secretary of State is currently the only competent authority. The effect of the repeal will be that the Secretary of State will no longer be able to authorise individuals to act as an insolvency practitioner. Individuals will only be able to obtain authorisation from one of a number of professional bodies recognised by the Secretary of State for that purpose. The vast majority of insolvency practitioners are already authorised by one of these bodies. The changes will reduce inconsistency of regulation by ensuring that all insolvency practitioners are authorised by one of the recognised professional bodies. The repeal of the provisions also removes a perceived conflict of interest with the Secretary of State’s role as an oversight regulator of the professional bodies.

595.Paragraph 22 makes a number of amendments to primary legislation that are consequential to the repeals made by paragraph 21. These amendments include removal of references to the Insolvency Practitioners Tribunal. The Insolvency Practitioners Tribunal exists only to consider objections to a competent authority’s decision to refuse an application for authorisation or withdraw a person’s authorisation to act as an insolvency practitioner. Consequently, the Insolvency Practitioners Tribunal will become redundant once the repeals made by paragraph 21 take full effect.

596.Paragraph 23 is a transitional and savings provision for two categories of individuals: those who are authorised by the Secretary of State to act as an insolvency practitioner at the date the repeals made by paragraph 21 take effect; and those who have applied to the Secretary of State for authorisation by that date but whose application has not been dealt with. Those who are already authorised will continue to be authorised during the transitional period. Those who apply to the Secretary of State for authorisation before the repeals made by paragraph 21 take effect will have their applications determined in accordance with the existing provisions.

597.The main amendments made by Part 6 of the Schedule form part of the law of England and Wales and Scotland, in line with the enactments that they amend. Part 6 will come into force on a day to be appointed by the Secretary of State in a commencement order.

Back to top


Print Options


Explanatory Notes

Text created by the government department responsible for the subject matter of the Act to explain what the Act sets out to achieve and to make the Act accessible to readers who are not legally qualified. Explanatory Notes were introduced in 1999 and accompany all Public Acts except Appropriation, Consolidated Fund, Finance and Consolidation Acts.


More Resources

Access essential accompanying documents and information for this legislation item from this tab. Dependent on the legislation item being viewed this may include:

  • the original print PDF of the as enacted version that was used for the print copy
  • lists of changes made by and/or affecting this legislation item
  • confers power and blanket amendment details
  • all formats of all associated documents
  • correction slips
  • links to related legislation and further information resources

Impact Assessments

Impact Assessments generally accompany all UK Government interventions of a regulatory nature that affect the private sector, civil society organisations and public services. They apply regardless of whether the regulation originates from a domestic or international source and can accompany primary (Acts etc) and secondary legislation (SIs). An Impact Assessment allows those with an interest in the policy area to understand:

  • Why the government is proposing to intervene;
  • The main options the government is considering, and which one is preferred;
  • How and to what extent new policies may impact on them; and,
  • The estimated costs and benefits of proposed measures.