- Latest available (Revised)
- Original (As enacted)
Revised legislation carried on this site may not be fully up to date. At the current time any known changes or effects made by subsequent legislation have been applied to the text of the legislation you are viewing by the editorial team. Please see ‘Frequently Asked Questions’ for details regarding the timescales for which new effects are identified and recorded on this site.
1This Schedule applies if the Secretary of State—E+W+S+N.I.
(a)makes the relevant decisions in relation to an individual, and
(b)imposes measures on the individual.
2The TPIM notice must include a statement that the Secretary of State reasonably considers that the urgency of the case requires measures to be imposed without obtaining the permission of the court under section 6.E+W+S+N.I.
3(1)Immediately after serving the TPIM notice, the Secretary of State must refer to the court the imposition of the measures on the individual.E+W+S+N.I.
(2)The function of the court on the reference is to consider whether the relevant decisions of the Secretary of State were obviously flawed.
(3)The court's consideration of the reference must begin within the period of 7 days beginning with the day on which the TPIM notice is served on the individual.
(4)The court may consider the reference—
(a)in the absence of the individual;
(b)without the individual having been notified of the reference; and
(c)without the individual having been given an opportunity (if the individual was aware of the reference) of making any representations to the court.
(5)But that does not limit the matters about which rules of court may be made.
4(1)In a case where the court determines that a decision of the Secretary of State that condition A, condition B or condition C is met is obviously flawed, the court must quash the TPIM notice.E+W+S+N.I.
(2)In a case where the court determines that a decision of the Secretary of State that condition D is met is obviously flawed, the court must quash those of the measures which it determines that decision relates to.
(3)If sub-paragraph (1) does not apply, the court must confirm the TPIM notice (subject to any quashing of measures under sub-paragraph (2)).
(4)If the court determines that the Secretary of State's decision that the urgency condition is met is obviously flawed, the court must make a declaration of that determination (whether it quashes or confirms the TPIM notice under the preceding provisions of this paragraph).
5(1)In determining a reference under paragraph 3, the court must apply the principles applicable on an application for judicial review.E+W+S+N.I.
(2)The court must ensure that the individual is notified of the court's decision on a reference under paragraph 3.
6(1)References in this Schedule to the urgency condition being met are references to condition E being met by virtue of section 3(5)(b) (urgency of the case requires measures to be imposed without obtaining the permission of the court).E+W+S+N.I.
(2)In this Schedule “relevant decisions” means the decisions that the following conditions are met—
(e)the urgency condition.
Geographical Extent: Indicates the geographical area that this provision applies to. For further information see ‘Frequently Asked Questions’.
Show Timeline of Changes: See how this legislation has or could change over time. Turning this feature on will show extra navigation options to go to these specific points in time. Return to the latest available version by using the controls above in the What Version box.
Text created by the government department responsible for the subject matter of the Act to explain what the Act sets out to achieve and to make the Act accessible to readers who are not legally qualified. Explanatory Notes were introduced in 1999 and accompany all Public Acts except Appropriation, Consolidated Fund, Finance and Consolidation Acts.
Click 'View More' or select 'More Resources' tab for additional information including: