C1 Part VIII Penalties for Market Abuse
The code
121 Codes: procedure.
1
2
The draft must be accompanied by—
a
a cost benefit analysis; and
b
notice that representations about the proposal may be made to the F2FCA within a specified time.
3
Before issuing the proposed code, the F2FCA must have regard to any representations made to it in accordance with subsection (2)(b).
4
If the F2FCA issues the proposed code it must publish an account, in general terms, of—
a
the representations made to it in accordance with subsection (2)(b); and
b
its response to them.
5
If the code differs from the draft published under subsection (1) in a way which is, in the opinion of the F2FCA, significant—
a
the F2FCA must (in addition to complying with subsection (4)) publish details of the difference; and
b
those details must be accompanied by a cost benefit analysis.
6
Subsections (1) to (5) do not apply if the F2FCA considers that there is an urgent need to publish the code.
7
Neither subsection (2)(a) nor subsection (5)(b) applies if the F2FCA considers—
a
that, making the appropriate comparison, there will be no increase in costs; or
b
that, making that comparison, there will be an increase in costs but the increase will be of minimal significance.
8
The F2FCA may charge a reasonable fee for providing a person with a copy of a draft published under subsection (1).
9
This section also applies to a proposal to alter or replace a code.
F110
Cost benefit analysis” means—
a
an analysis of the costs together with an analysis of the benefits that will arise—
i
if the proposed code is issued, or
ii
if subsection (5)(b) applies, from the code that has been issued, and
b
subject to subsection (10A), an estimate of those costs and of those benefits.
10A
If, in the opinion of the FCA—
a
the costs or benefits referred to in subsection (10) cannot reasonably be estimated, or
b
it is not reasonably practicable to produce an estimate,
the cost benefit analysis need not estimate them, but must include a statement of the FCA's opinion and an explanation of it.
11
“The appropriate comparison” means—
a
in relation to subsection (2)(a), a comparison between the overall position if the code is issued and the overall position if it is not issued;
b
in relation to subsection (5)(b), a comparison between the overall position after the issuing of the code and the overall position before it was issued.
Pt. 8 applied (with modifications) (18.6.2012) by The Recognised Auction Platforms Regulations 2011 (S.I. 2011/2699), regs. 1(2)(b), 6, Sch. 1 (as amended (3.1.2018) by The Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (Markets in Financial Instruments) (No.2) Regulations 2017 (S.I. 2017/1255), regs. 2(b), 9)