SCHEDULES

SCHEDULE 1 Exclusions: Mergers and Concentrations

Part I Mergers

Enterprises ceasing to be distinct: the Chapter I prohibition

1

1

To the extent to which an agreement (either on its own or when taken together with another agreement) results, or if carried out would result, in any two enterprises ceasing to be distinct enterprises for the purposes of F6Part V of the M1Fair Trading Act 1973 (“the 1973 Act”)F6Part 3 of the Enterprise Act 2002 (“the 2002 Act”), the Chapter I prohibition does not apply to the agreement.

2

The exclusion provided by sub-paragraph (1) extends to any provision directly related and necessary to the implementation of the merger provisions.

3

In sub-paragraph (2) “merger provisions” means the provisions of the agreement which cause, or if carried out would cause, the agreement to have the result mentioned in sub-paragraph (1).

4

F7Section 65 of the 1973 ActF7Section 26 of the 2002 Act applies for the purposes of this paragraph as if—

a

in subsection (3) (circumstances in which a person or group of persons may be treated as having control of an enterprise), and

b

in subsection (4) (circumstances in which a person or group of persons may be treated as bringing an enterprise under their control),

for “may” there were substituted “ must ”.

Enterprises ceasing to be distinct: the Chapter II prohibition

2

1

To the extent to which conduct (either on its own or when taken together with other conduct)—

a

results in any two enterprises ceasing to be distinct enterprises for the purposes of F8Part V of the 1973 ActF8Part 3 of the 2002 Act), or

b

is directly related and necessary to the attainment of the result mentioned in paragraph (a),

the Chapter II prohibition does not apply to that conduct.

2

F9Section 65 of the 1973 ActF9Section 26 of the 2002 Act applies for the purposes of this paragraph as it applies for the purposes of paragraph 1.

Transfer of a newspaper or of newspaper assets

F33

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Withdrawal of the paragraph 1 exclusion

C14

1

The exclusion provided by paragraph 1 does not apply to a particular agreement if the F10CMA gives a direction under this paragraph to that effect.

2

If the F10CMA is considering whether to give a direction under this paragraph, F1it may by notice in writing require any party to the agreement in question to give F1the F10CMA such information in connection with the agreement as F1it may require.

3

The F10CMA may give a direction under this paragraph only as provided in sub-paragraph (4) or (5).

4

If at the end of such period as may be specified in rules under section 51 a person has failed, without reasonable excuse, to comply with a requirement imposed under sub-paragraph (2), the F10CMA may give a direction under this paragraph.

5

The F10CMA may also give a direction under this paragraph if—

F4a

it considers that the agreement will, if not excluded, infringe the Chapter I prohibition; and

b

the agreement is not a protected agreement.

6

F5For the purposes of sub-paragraph (5), an individual exemption is unconditional if no conditions or obligations are imposed in respect of it under section 4(3)(a).

7

A direction under this paragraph—

a

must be in writing;

b

may be made so as to have effect from a date specified in the direction (which may not be earlier than the date on which it is given).

Protected agreements

C3C2C45

An agreement is a protected agreement for the purposes of paragraph 4 if—

F2a

the F11CMA or (as the case may be) the Secretary of State has published its or his decision not to make a reference F12... under section 22, 33, 45 or 62 of the 2002 Act in connection with the agreement;

b

the F11CMA or (as the case may be) the Secretary of State has made a reference F12... under section 22, 33, 45 or 62 of the 2002 Act in connection with the agreement and F13the CMA has found that the agreement has given rise to, or would if carried out give rise to, a relevant merger situation or (as the case may be) a special merger situation;

c

the agreement does not fall within paragraph (a) or (b) but has given rise to, or would if carried out give rise to, enterprises to which it relates being regarded under section 26 of the 2002 Act as ceasing to be distinct enterprises (otherwise than as the result of subsection (3) or (4)(b) of that section); or

d

the F11CMA has made a reference F12... under section 32 of the Water Industry Act 1991 in connection with the agreement and F13the CMA has found that the agreement has given rise to, or would if carried out give rise to, a merger of any two or more water enterprises of the kind to which that section applies.