4In section 100—
(a)in subsection (1), after the word “question” there shall be inserted the words “ other than a claim or question relating to an attendance allowance or a disability living allowance, ”;
(b)in subsection (2), after the word “decision” there shall be inserted the words “ falling within subsection (1) above ”; and
(c)in subsection (7), after the word “amount” there shall be inserted the words “ of benefit (other than an attendance allowance or a disability living allowance) ”.
Commencement Information
I1Sch. 1 para. 4 wholly in force 6.4.1992: in force for certain purposes 3.2.1992 and for all other purposes 6.4.1992; see s. 15(2) and S.I. 1991/2617, art. 2(b)(c)(f), Sch.
5The following sections shall be inserted after that section—
“100A(1)On an application under this section made within the prescribed period, a decision of an adjudication officer under section 99 above which relates to an attendance allowance or a disability living allowance may be reviewed on any ground.
(2)On an application under this section made after the end of the prescribed period, such a decision may be reviewed if—
(a)the adjudication officer is satisfied that the decision was given in ignorance of, or was based on a mistake as to, some material fact; or
(b)there has been any relevant change of circumstances since the decision was given; or
(c)it is anticipated that a relevant change of circumstances will so occur; or
(d)the decision was erroneous in point of law; or
(e)the decision was to make an award for a period wholly or partly after the date on which the claim was made or treated as made but subject to a condition being fulfilled and that condition has not been fulfilled,
but regulations may provide that a decision may not be reviewed on the ground mentioned in paragraph (a) above unless the officer is satisfied as mentioned in that paragraph by fresh evidence.
(3)Regulations may prescribe what are, or are not, relevant changes of circumstances for the purposes of subsection (2)(b) and (c) above.
(4)On an application under this section made after the end of the prescribed period, a decision of an adjudication officer under section 99 above that a person is or was at any time terminally ill for the purposes of section 35(2B), 37ZB(5) or 37ZC(12) above may be reviewed if there has been a change of medical opinion with respect to his condition or his reasonable expectation of life.
(5)The claimant shall be given such notification as may be prescribed of a decision which may be reviewed under this section and of his right to a review under subsection (1) above.
(6)A question may be raised with a view to a review under this section by means of an application made in writing to an adjudication officer stating the grounds of the application and supplying such information and evidence as may be prescribed.
(7)Regulations—
(a)may provide for enabling or requiring, in prescribed circumstances, a review under this section notwithstanding that no application under subsection (6) above has been made; and
(b)if they do so provide, shall specify under which provision of this section a review carried out by virtue of any such regulations falls.
(8)Reviews under this section shall be carried out by adjudication officers.
(9)Different aspects of any question which arises on such a review may be dealt with by different adjudication officers; and for this purpose this section and the other provisions of this Part of this Act which relate to reviews under this section shall apply with any necessary modifications.
(10)If a review is under subsection (1) above, the officer who took the decision under review shall not deal with any question which arises on the review.
(11)Except in prescribed circumstances, where a claim for a disability living allowance in respect of a person already awarded such an allowance by an adjudication officer is made or treated as made during the period for which he has been awarded the allowance, it shall be treated as an application for a review under this section.
(12)Where—
(a)a claim for an attendance allowance or a disability living allowance in respect of a person has been refused; and
(b)a further claim for the same allowance is made in respect of him within the period prescribed under subsection (1) above,
the further claim shall be treated as an application for a review under that subsection.
100B(1)Subsections (2) and (4) of section 100A above shall apply to a decision on a review under subsection (1) of that section as they apply to a decision of an adjudication officer under section 99 above but as if the words “made after the end of the prescribed period” were omitted from each subsection.
(2)Subsections (1), (2) and (4) of section 100A above shall apply—
(a)to a decision on a review under subsection (2) or (4) of that section; and
(b)to a refusal to review a decision under subsection (2) or (4) of that section,
as they apply to a decision of an adjudication officer under section 99 above.
(3)The claimant shall be given such notification as may be prescribed—
(a)of a decision on a review under section 100A above;
(b)if the review was under section 100A(1), of his right of appeal under section 100D below; and
(c)if it was under section 100A(2) or (4), of his right to a further review under section 100A(1).
100C(1)An award of an attendance allowance or a disability living allowance on a review under section 100A above replaces any award which was the subject of the review.
(2)Where a person who has been awarded a disability living allowance consisting of one component applies or is treated as applying for a review under section 100A above and alleges that he is also entitled to the other component, the adjudication officer need not consider the question of his entitlement to the component which he has already been awarded or the rate of that component.
(3)Where a person who has been awarded a disability living allowance consisting of both components applies or is treated as applying for a review under section 100A above and alleges that he is entitled to one component at a rate higher than that at which it has been awarded, the adjudication officer need not consider the question of his entitlement to the other component or the rate of that component.
(4)Where a person has been awarded a component for life, on a review under section 100A above the adjudication officer shall not consider the question of his entitlement to that component or the rate of that component or the period for which it has been awarded unless—
(a)the person awarded the component expressly applies for the consideration of that question; or
(b)information is available to the adjudication officer which gives him reasonable grounds for believing that entitlement to the component, or entitlement to it at the rate awarded or for that period, ought not to continue.
(5)No decision which relates to an attendance allowance or a disability living allowance shall be reviewed under section 100A above on the ground that the person is or was at any time terminally ill, within the meaning of section 35(2C) above, unless an application for review is made expressly on that ground either—
(a)by the person himself; or
(b)by any other person purporting to act on his behalf, whether or not that other person is acting with his knowledge or authority;
and a decision may be so reviewed on such an application, notwithstanding that no claim under section 35(2B) or 37ZB(5) or 37ZC(12) above has been made.
(6)Where a decision is reviewed under section 100A above on the ground that it is anticipated that a change of circumstances will occur, the decision given on review—
(a)shall take effect on the day prescribed for that purpose by reference to the date on which the change of circumstances is expected to occur; and
(b)shall be reviewed again if the change of circumstances either does not occur or occurs otherwise than on that date.
(7)Where a claimant has appealed against a decision of an adjudication officer under section 100D below and the decision is reviewed again under section 100A(2) or (4) above by an adjudication officer, then—
(a)if the adjudication officer considers that the decision which he has made on the review is the same as the decision that would have been made on the appeal had every ground of the appeal succeeded, then the appeal shall lapse; but
(b)in any other case, the review shall be of no effect and the appeal shall proceed accordingly.
(8)Subsections (5) and (7) to (10) of section 104 below apply in relation to a review under section 100A above as they apply to a review under that section but as if—
(a)subsection (5)(a) were omitted; and
(b)in subsection (7) for the words “subsection (1A) above” there were substituted t he words “section 100A above on the ground that it was erroneous in point of law”.
(9)Where an adjudication officer has determined that any amount paid by way of an attendance allowance or a disability living allowance is recoverable under or by virtue of section 53 of the Social Security Act 1986 (overpayments), any person from whom he has determined that it is recoverable shall have the same right of review under section 100A above as a claimant.
(10)This Act shall have effect in relation to a review by virtue of subsection (9) above as if any reference to the claimant were a reference to the person from whom the adjudication officer has determined that the amount in question is recoverable.
100D(1)Where an adjudication officer has given a decision on a review under section 100A(1) above, the claimant or such other person as may be prescribed may appeal—
(a)in prescribed cases, to a disability appeal tribunal; and
(b)in any other case, to a social security appeal tribunal.
(2)Regulations may make provision as to the manner in which, and the time within which, appeals are to be brought.
(3)An award of an attendance allowance or a disability living allowance on an appeal replaces any award which was the subject of the appeal.
(4)Where a person who has been awarded a disability living allowance consisting of one component alleges on an appeal that he is also entitled to the other component, the tribunal need not consider the question of his entitlement to the component which he has already been awarded or the rate of that component.
(5)Where a person who has been awarded a disability living allowance consisting of both components alleges on an appeal that he is entitled to one component at a rate higher than that at which it has been awarded, the tribunal need not consider the question of his entitlement to the other component or the rate of that component.
(6)The tribunal shall not consider—
(a)a person’s entitlement to a component which has been awarded for life; or
(b)the rate of a component so awarded; or
(c)the period for which a component has been so awarded,
unless—
(i)the appeal expressly raises that question; or
(ii)information is available to the tribunal which gives it reasonable grounds for believing that entitlement to the component, or entitlement to it at the rate awarded or for that period, ought not to continue.
(7)Schedule 10A to this Act has effect with respect to disability appeal tribunals.”.
Commencement Information
I2Sch. 1 para. 5 wholly in force 6.4.1992; in force for certain purposes 19.11.1991, 3.2.1992 and for all other purposes 6.4.1992; see s. 15(2) and S.I. 1991/2617, art. 2(c)(f), Sch.
9The following section shall be inserted after that section—
“104A(1)Any decision under this Act of a social security appeal tribunal, a disability appeal tribunal or a Commissioner which relates to an attendance allowance or a disability living allowance may be reviewed at any time by an adjudication officer if—
(a)he is satisfied that the decision was given in ignorance of, or was based on a mistake as to, some material fact; or
(b)there has been any relevant change of circumstances since the decision was given; or
(c)it is anticipated that a relevant change of circumstances will so occur; or
(d)the decision was that a person is or was at any time terminally ill for the purposes of section 35(2B), 37ZB(5) or 37ZC(12) above and there has been a change of medical opinion with respect to his condition or his reasonable expectation of life; or
(e)the decision was to make an award for a period wholly or partly after the date on which the claim was made or treated as made but subject to a condition being fulfilled and that condition has not been fulfilled,
but regulations may provide that a decision may not be reviewed on the ground mentioned in paragraph (a) above unless the officer is satisfied as mentioned in that paragraph by fresh evidence.
(2)Regulations may prescribe what are, or are not, relevant changes of circumstances for the purposes of subsection (1)(b) and (c) above.
(3)A question may be raised with a view to a review under this section by means of an application made in writing to an adjudication officer, stating the grounds of the application and supplying such information and evidence as may be prescribed.
(4)Reviews under this section shall be carried out by adjudication officers.
(5)Except in prescribed circumstances, where a claim for a disability living allowance in respect of a person already awarded such an allowance on an appeal is made or treated as made during the period for which he has been awarded the allowance, it shall be treated as an application for a review under this section.
(6)Subsections (1), (2) and (4) of section 100A above shall apply—
(a)to a decision on a review under this section; and
(b)to a refusal to review a decision such as is mentioned in subsection (1) above,
as they apply to a decision of an adjudication officer under section 99 above.
(7)The person whose claim was the subject of the appeal the decision on which has been reviewed under this section shall be given such notification as may be prescribed—
(a)of the decision on the review; and
(b)of his right to a further review under section 100A(1) above.
(8)Section 100A(9) above and section 100C(1) to (5) above shall apply in relation to a review under this section as they apply to a review under section 100A above.
(9)Subsections (1ZA), (3A) and (5) of section 104 above shall apply in relation to a review under this section as they apply to a review under that section but as if—
(a)in subsection (1ZA), “(1)(c)” were substituted for “(1)(bb)”;
(b)in subsection (3A), “(3)” were substituted for “(2)”; and
(c)subsection (5)(a) were omitted.”.
Commencement Information
I3Sch. 1 para. 9 wholly in force at 6. 4. 1992: in force for certain purposes 19.11.1991, 3 2.1992 and for all other purposes 6. 4. 1992; see s. 15(2) and S.I. 1991/2617, art. 2(c)(f), Sch.
10In section 115(2) after the words “social security appeal tribunal,” there shall be inserted the words “ a disability appeal tribunal, ”.
Commencement Information
I4Sch. 1 para. 10 wholly in force at 3.2.1992 see s. 15(2) and S.I. 1991/2617, art. 2(d).
11The following paragraph shall be inserted after section 115A(2)(d)—
“(dd)a disability appeal tribunal;”.
Commencement Information
I5Sch. 1 para. 11 wholly in force at 3.2.1992 see s. 15(2) and S.I. 1991/2617, art. 2(d).
12The following paragraph shall be inserted after section 115B(2)(c)—
“(cc)a disability appeal tribunal;”.
Commencement Information
I6Sch. 1 para. 12 wholly in force at 3.2.1992 see s. 15(2) and S.I. 1991/2617, art. 2(d).
4In section 100—
(a)in subsection (1), after the word “question” there shall be inserted the words “ other than a claim or question relating to an attendance allowance or a disability living allowance, ”;
(b)in subsection (2), after the word “decision” there shall be inserted the words “ falling within subsection (1) above ”; and
(c)in subsection (7), after the word “amount” there shall be inserted the words “ of benefit (other than an attendance allowance or a disability living allowance) ”.
Commencement Information
I1Sch. 1 para. 4 wholly in force 6.4.1992: in force for certain purposes 3.2.1992 and for all other purposes 6.4.1992; see s. 15(2) and S.I. 1991/2617, art. 2(b)(c)(f), Sch.