- Draft legislation
This is a draft item of legislation. This draft has since been made as a UK Statutory Instrument: The Armed Forces (Court Martial) (Amendment) Rules 2013 No. 1851
Draft Rules laid before Parliament under section 373(3) of the Armed Forces Act 2006, for approval by resolution of each House of Parliament.
Draft Statutory Instruments
Coming into force
1st August 2013
The Secretary of State in exercise of the powers conferred by sections 155 and 163 of the Armed Forces Act 2006(1), makes the following Rules:
In accordance with section 373(3) of the Armed Forces Act 2006 a draft of this instrument was laid before, and approved by resolution of, each House of Parliament.
1. These Rules may be cited as the Armed Forces (Court Martial) (Amendment) Rules 2013, and shall come into force on 1st August 2013.
2. In these Rules “the 2009 Rules” means the Armed Forces (Court Martial) Rules 2009(2).
3.—(1) Rule 29 of the 2009 Rules is amended as follows.
(2) In rule 29(3), for “This rules applies to sentencing proceedings” substitute “Subject to rule 29A, this rule applies to sentencing proceedings”.
(3) In rule 29(4), for “This rule applies to variation proceedings” substitute “Subject to rule 29A, this rule applies to variation proceedings”.
4. After Rule 29 insert—
29A. Rule 29 does not apply to—
(a)sentencing proceedings where the sole defendant has entered a guilty plea before the commencement of trial proceedings;
(b)sentencing proceedings where there are two or more co-defendants, and each co-defendant has entered a guilty plea before the commencement of trial proceedings; and
(c)variation proceedings where paragraph (a) or (b) applied to the sentencing proceedings in which the sentence which falls to be varied was imposed.”
5. After rule 151 of the 2009 Rules, insert—
151A.—(1) The court’s powers to certify a failure to comply with a production order may be exercised only at a hearing under this rule.
(2) If so directed by a judge advocate, the court administration officer shall—
(a)appoint a time and place for a hearing under this rule; and
(b)notify the relevant person and the Director of the time and place so appointed.
(3) The relevant person and the Director are entitled to be heard at the hearing.
(4) The relevant person need not attend the hearing, but the court may exercise its powers in the relevant person’s absence.
(5) In this rule—
“production order” means an order under paragraph 5 of Schedule 1 to the Armed Forces (Powers of Stop and Search, Search, Seizure and Retention) Order 2009(3);
the reference to the court’s powers to certify a failure to comply with a production order is to its powers under paragraph 11A(2) of that Schedule; and
“the relevant person” means the person failing to comply.”
6. In Schedule 2 to the 2009 Rules, omit Part 8.
Minister of State
Ministry of Defence
(This note is not part of the Rules)
These Rules amend the Armed Forces (Court Martial) Rules 2009 (S.I. 2009/2041). Rule 29 of those rules require a minimum of five lay members to sit in the Court Martial in proceedings described in that rule. Rules 3 and 4 provide so that rule 29 does not apply to sentencing or variation proceedings where a sole defendant or all co-defendants have entered a guilty plea before the commencement of trial proceedings. In such proceedings section 155(1) of the Armed Forces Act 2006 (c. 52) applies so that there must be at least three, but not more than five, lay members.
Under paragraph 5 of Schedule 1 to the Armed Forces (Powers of Stop and Search, Search, Seizure and Retention) Order 2009 (S.I. 2009/2056) a judge advocate may make an order requiring a person to produce material to a service policeman or to give a service policeman access to it. Paragraph 11A(2) of that Schedule enables the Court Martial to certify to a civilian court which has power to commit for contempt a failure to comply with an order under paragraph 5. Rule 5 inserts into the Armed Forces (Court Martial) Rules 2009 a new rule 151A, which prescribes a procedure for the exercise of the Court Martial’s power to certify.
Rule 6 revokes Part 8 of Schedule 2 to the Armed Forces (Court Martial) Rules 2009, in consequence of the revocation of Part 20 of those rules by Schedule 5 to the Armed Forces Act 2011 (c. 18). Part 8 made transitional modifications to Part 20.
Latest Available (revised):The latest available updated version of the legislation incorporating changes made by subsequent legislation and applied by our editorial team. Changes we have not yet applied to the text, can be found in the ‘Changes to Legislation’ area.
Original (As Enacted or Made):The original version of the legislation as it stood when it was enacted or made. No changes have been applied to the text.
Draft Explanatory Memorandum sets out a brief statement of the purpose of a Draft Statutory Instrument and provides information about its policy objective and policy implications. They aim to make the Draft Statutory Instrument accessible to readers who are not legally qualified accompany any Statutory Instrument or Draft Statutory Instrument laid before Parliament from June 2004 onwards.
Access essential accompanying documents and information for this legislation item from this tab. Dependent on the legislation item being viewed this may include:
Use this menu to access essential accompanying documents and information for this legislation item. Dependent on the legislation item being viewed this may include:
Click 'View More' or select 'More Resources' tab for additional information including: