PART 5THE AWARD OF A PUBLIC CONTRACT
Criteria for the award of a public contract30
1
Subject to regulation 18(28) and to paragraphs (6) and (9) of this regulation, a contracting authority must award a public contract on the basis of the offer which—
a
is the most economically advantageous from the point of view of the contracting authority; or
b
offers the lowest price.
2
In order to determine that an offer is the most economically advantageous, a contracting authority must use criteria linked to the subject matter of the contract which may include quality, price, technical merit, aesthetic and functional characteristics, environmental characteristics, running costs, cost effectiveness, after sales service, technical assistance, delivery date and delivery period or period of completion.
3
Where a contracting authority intends to award a public contract on the basis of the offer which is the most economically advantageous it must state the weighting which it gives to each of the criteria chosen in the contract notice or in the contract documents or, in the case of a competitive dialogue procedure, in the descriptive document.
4
When stating the weightings referred to in paragraph (3), a contracting authority may give the weightings a range and specify a minimum and maximum weighting where it considers it appropriate in view of the subject matter of the contract.
5
Where, in the opinion of the contracting authority, it is not possible to provide weightings for the criteria referred to in paragraph (3) on objective grounds, the contracting authority must indicate the criteria in descending order of importance in the contract notice or contract documents or, in the case of a competitive dialogue procedure, in the descriptive document.
6
If an offer for a public contract is abnormally low the contracting authority may reject that offer but only if it has—
a
requested in writing an explanation of the offer or of those parts which it considers contribute to the offer being abnormally low;
b
taken account of the evidence provided in response to a request in writing; and
c
subsequently verified the offer or parts of the offer being abnormally low with the economic operator.
7
Where a contracting authority requests an explanation in accordance with paragraph (6), the information requested may, in particular, include—
a
the economics of the method of construction, the manufacturing process or the services provided;
b
the technical solutions suggested by the economic operator or the exceptionally favourable conditions available to the economic operator for the execution of the work or works, for the supply of goods or the provision of the services;
c
the originality of the work, works, goods or services proposed by the economic operator;
d
compliance with the provisions relating to employment protection and working conditions in force at the place where the contract is to be performed; or
e
the possibility of the economic operator obtaining State aid.
8
Where a contracting authority establishes that a tender is abnormally low because the economic operator has obtained State aid, the offer may be rejected on that ground alone only after—
a
consultation with the economic operator; and
b
the economic operator is unable to prove, within a reasonable time limit fixed by the contracting authority, that the aid was granted in a way which is compatible with the TFEU.
9
Where a contracting authority rejects an abnormally low offer in accordance with paragraph (8), it must send a report justifying the rejection to the Scottish Ministers for onward transmission to the Commission.
10
In this regulation “offer” includes a bid by one part of a contracting authority to provide services, to carry out a work or works or to make goods available to another part of the contracting authority when the former part is invited by the latter part to compete with the offers sought from other persons.