- Latest available (Revised)
- Original (As made)
This is the original version (as it was originally made). This item of legislation is currently only available in its original format.
Rule 2(2)(c)
19.—(1) In this Part of this Order—
(a)“an ADR process” means mediation, conciliation or another dispute resolution process approved by the Court, but does not include arbitration; and
(b)“party” includes the personal representative of a deceased party.
20.—(1) The Court, on the application of any of the parties or of its own motion, may, when it considers it appropriate and having regard to all the circumstances of the case, order that proceedings or any issue therein be adjourned for such time as the Court considers just and convenient and—
(a)invite the parties to use an ADR process to settle or determine the proceedings or issue; or
(b)where the parties consent, refer the proceedings or issue to such process,
and may, for the purposes of such invitation or reference, invite the parties to attend such information session on the use of mediation, if any, as the Court may specify.
(2) Where the parties decide to use an ADR process, the Court may make an order extending the time for compliance by any party with any provision of these Rules or any order of the Court in the proceedings, and may make such further or other orders or give such directions as the Court considers will facilitate the effective use of that process.
21. An application by a party for an order under rule 20 shall be made by notice of motion and shall, unless the Court otherwise orders, be supported by an affidavit.
22. Save where the Court for special reason to be stated in the Court’s order allows, an application for an order under rule 20 shall not be made later than 56 days before the date on which the proceedings are first listed for hearing.”
Rule 2(4)(b)
45.—(1) This Part of this Order applies to mediated cross-border disputes that are subject to Directive 2008/52/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 May 2008 on certain aspects of mediation in civil and commercial matters(1).
(2) In this Part—
(a)“Mediation Directive” means Directive 2008/52/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 May 2008 on certain aspects of mediation in civil and commercial matters;
(b)“cross-border dispute” has the meaning given by article 2 of the Mediation Directive;
(c)“mediation” has the meaning given by article 3(a) of the Mediation Directive;
(d)“mediation administrator” means a person involved in the administration of the mediation process;
(e)“mediation evidence” means evidence arising out of or in connection with a mediation process;
(f)“mediation settlement” means the content of a written agreement resulting from mediation of a relevant dispute;
(g)“mediation settlement agreement” means a written agreement resulting from mediation of a relevant dispute;
(h)“mediation settlement enforcement order” means an order made under rule 47(6);
(i)“mediator” has the meaning given by article 3(b) of the Mediation Directive; and
(j)“relevant dispute” means a cross-border dispute that is subject to the Mediation Directive.
46. Any applications to the High Court under the Mediation Directive shall be assigned to the Queen’s Bench Division and the powers conferred on the Court by that Directive may be dealt with by a judge in chambers or by a master.
47.—(1) Where the parties, or one of them with the explicit consent of the others, wish to apply for a mediation settlement to be made enforceable, the parties or party may apply by way of originating summons.
(2) An originating summons under this rule may be issued without naming a defendant and no appearance need be entered.
(3) An application shall be made ex parte and supported by an affidavit exhibiting the mediation settlement agreement.
(4) Except to the extent that paragraph (8) applies, the parties shall lodge any evidence of explicit consent to the application under paragraph (1) when the parties lodge the application.
(5) A copy of the summons, mediation settlement agreement and, if applicable, evidence of explicit consent shall be served on all parties to the mediation settlement agreement who are not also parties to the application.
(6) Subject to paragraph (7), where an application is made under paragraph (1), the Court will make an order making the mediation settlement enforceable.
(7) The Court will not make an order under paragraph (6) unless the Court has evidence that each of the parties to the mediation settlement agreement has given explicit consent to the application for the order.
(8) Where a party to the mediation settlement agreement—
(a)has agreed in the mediation settlement agreement that a mediation settlement enforcement order should be made in respect of that mediation settlement;
(b)is a party to the application under paragraph (1); or
(c)has written to the Court consenting to the application for the mediation settlement enforcement order,
that party is deemed to have given explicit consent to the application for the mediation settlement enforcement order.
(9) An application under paragraph (1) will be dealt with without a hearing, unless the Court otherwise directs.
(10) Where the application is supported by evidence of explicit consent to the application by a party to the mediation settlement agreement, the evidence shall be in English or accompanied by a translation into English.
(11) Where a party to the mediation settlement agreement writes to the Court consenting to the making of the mediation settlement enforcement order, the correspondence shall be in English or accompanied by a translation into English.
(12) Where the parties to pending proceedings agree to apply for a mediation settlement enforcement order, they shall inform the Court immediately.
48. Where a person applies to enforce a mediation settlement enforcement order which is expressed in a foreign currency, the application shall contain a certificate of the sterling equivalent of the sum remaining due under the order at the close of business on the day before the date of the application.
49.—(1) Where a person seeks disclosure or inspection of mediation evidence that is in the control of a mediator or mediation administrator, that person shall apply by way of originating summons.
(2) Where an application is made under paragraph (1), the mediator or mediation administrator who has control of the mediation evidence shall be named as a respondent to the application and shall be served with a copy of the summons.
(3) Evidence in support of the application under paragraph (1) shall include evidence that—
(a)all parties to the mediation agree to the disclosure or inspection of the mediation evidence;
(b)disclosure or inspection of the mediation evidence is necessary for overriding considerations of public policy, in accordance with article 7(1)(a) of the Mediation Directive; or
(c)disclosure or inspection of the mediation settlement is necessary to implement or enforce the mediation settlement agreement.
(4) Where this rule applies, Orders 24, 38 and 39 shall apply to the extent they are consistent with this rule.
50.—(1) This rule applies where a party wishes to obtain mediation evidence from a mediator or mediation administrator by—
(a)a witness summons;
(b)cross-examination with permission of the court under Order 38, rule 2(3) or rule 19;
(c)an order under Order 39, rule 1 (power to order depositions to be taken);
(d)an order under Order 39, rule 3 (order for the issue of a letter of request); or
(e)an order under Order 39, rule 4 (enforcing attendance of witness at examination).
(2) When applying for a witness summons, permission under Order 38, rule 2(3) or rule 19, or an order under Order 39, rule 1, 3 or 4, the party shall provide the Court with evidence that—
(a)all parties to the mediation agree to the obtaining of the mediation evidence;
(b)obtaining the mediation evidence is necessary for overriding considerations of public policy, in accordance with article 7(1)(a) of the Mediation Directive; or
(c)the disclosure or inspection of the mediation settlement is necessary to implement or enforce the mediation settlement agreement.
(3) When considering a request for a witness summons, permission under Order 38, rule 2(3) or rule 19, or an order under Order 39, rule 1, 3 or 4, the Court may invite any person, whether or not a party, to make representations.
(4) Where this rule applies, Orders 24, 38 and 39 shall apply to the extent they are consistent with this rule.”
Rule 2(5)
1. In this Order—
“defendant” has the same meaning as “respondent” in the Act;
“Master” means the Master (Queen’s Bench and Appeals)
“the Act” means the Coroners and Justice Act 2009(2), a section referred to by number means the section so numbered in the Act, and expressions used have the same meaning as in the Act;.
2. In this Order, the jurisdiction of the High Court under the Act shall be assigned to the Queen’s Bench Division and shall be exercised by a judge in chambers.
3. An originating summons under this Order shall be entitled in the matter of the defendant, naming him, and in the matter of the Act, and all subsequent documents shall be so entitled.
4.—(1) An application under section 161 for an exploitation proceeds order shall be made by originating summons in Form No. 7 of Appendix A.
(2) An application under paragraph (1) shall be supported by an affidavit, which shall—
(a)provide evidence that the Advocate General for Northern Ireland has consented to the application being brought;
(b)provide evidence that the defendant is a qualifying offender in accordance with sections 156, 157 or 158(3) by attaching—
(i)a certificate of conviction or finding by a United Kingdom court in respect of a relevant offence; or
(ii)where the defendant falls under section 156(3), a document from a court or authority, in the jurisdiction concerned, confirming the conviction or finding by that court in respect of a relevant offence;
(c)specify how the defendant has obtained exploitation proceeds from the relevant offence;
(d)identify the benefits derived by the defendant from such exploitation; and
(e)specify the reasons why an exploitation proceeds order should be made, having regard to the matters mentioned in section 162(3).
(3) Where a document provided in accordance with paragraph (2)(b)(ii) is not in English, it shall be accompanied by a translation of that document into English and shall be certified by the translator to be a correct translation; and the certificate shall contain a statement of that person’s full name, his address and qualifications for making the translation.
5.—(1) An application under section 166(3) or (5) shall be made by way of summons.
(2) An application under paragraph (1) shall be supported by an affidavit which shall—
(a)specify how the conditions in sections 166(1), 166(2) or 166(4) are satisfied; and
(b)attach—
(i)a certificate of order as evidence of the conviction in respect of the relevant offence having been quashed; or
(ii)a document from a court or authority in the jurisdiction concerned, confirming that the conviction in respect of the relevant offence has been quashed.
(3) Where a document provided in accordance with paragraph (2)(b)(ii) is not in English, it shall be accompanied by a translation of that document into English and shall be certified by the translator to be a correct translation; and the certificate shall contain a statement of that person’s full name, his address and qualifications for making the translation.
6. An application under section 167 shall be made by way of summons, supported by affidavit, which shall—
(a)give full particulars of the grounds of the application in accordance with rule 4(2); and
(b)attach a transcript of the earlier application along with a copy of the earlier order.
7.—(1) Where an additional proceeds reporting order is sought under section 168, an application for an order may be included in the originating summons under rule 4(1), and the affidavit in support shall specify the reasons as to why the order is sought having regard to section 168(2).
(2) An application to vary or discharge an additional proceeds reporting order may be made by—
(a)the defendant; or
(b)the person to whom financial reports are to be made under the order.
(3) An application under paragraph (2) shall be made by way of summons supported by affidavit, which shall—
(a)attach a copy of the order made under section 168; and
(b)specify the reasons for the variation or discharge sought.”
OJ No. L136, 24.05.2008.
Latest Available (revised):The latest available updated version of the legislation incorporating changes made by subsequent legislation and applied by our editorial team. Changes we have not yet applied to the text, can be found in the ‘Changes to Legislation’ area.
Original (As Enacted or Made): The original version of the legislation as it stood when it was enacted or made. No changes have been applied to the text.
Explanatory Memorandum sets out a brief statement of the purpose of a Statutory Rule and provides information about its policy objective and policy implications. They aim to make the Statutory Rule accessible to readers who are not legally qualified and accompany any Northern Ireland Statutory Rule or Draft Northern Ireland Statutory Rule laid before the UK Parliament during the suspension of the Northern Ireland Assembly.
Access essential accompanying documents and information for this legislation item from this tab. Dependent on the legislation item being viewed this may include:
Use this menu to access essential accompanying documents and information for this legislation item. Dependent on the legislation item being viewed this may include:
Click 'View More' or select 'More Resources' tab for additional information including: