PART IIIPATIENTS CONCERNED IN CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS OR UNDER SENTENCE

Procedure during trial on indictment

Procedure in relation to unfitness to be triedC1C349

1

The following provisions of this Article apply where, on the trial of a person charged on indictment with the commission of an offence, the question arises (at the instance of the defence or otherwise) whether the accused is unfit to be tried (in this Article referred to as “the question of fitness to be tried”).

2

Subject to paragraph (3), the question of fitness to be tried shall be determined as soon as it arises.

3

If, having regard to the nature of the supposed mental condition of the accused, the court is of opinion that it is expedient so to do and in the interests of the accused, the court may—

a

postpone consideration of the question of fitness to be tried until any time up to the opening of the case for the defence; and

b

if, before the said question falls to be determined, the jury returns a verdict of acquittal on the count or each of the counts on which the accused is being tried, that question shall not be determined.

4

The question of fitness to be tried shall be determinedF1 by the court without a jury.

F24A

F1The court shall not make a determination under paragraph (4) except on the oral evidence of a medical practitioner appointed for the purposes of Part II by F3RQIA and on the written or oral evidence of one other medical practitioner.

Paras. (5)‐(8) rep. by 1996 NI 24

9

In this Article andF2 Articles 49A, 50A and 51(6) “unfit to be tried” includes unfit to plead.

F4Finding that the accused did the act or made the omission charged against him49A

1

This Article applies where in accordance with Article 49(4) it is determined by aF5 court that the accused is unfit to be tried.

2

The trial shall not proceed or further proceed but it shall be determined by a jury—

a

on the evidence (if any) already given in the trial; and

b

on such evidence as may be adduced or further adduced by the prosecution, or adduced by a person appointed by the court under this Article to put the case for the defence,

whether it is satisfied, as respects the count or each of the counts on which the accused was to be or was being tried, that he did the act or made the omission charged against him as the offence.

3

If as respects that count or any of those counts the jury is satisfied as mentioned in paragraph (2), it shall make a finding that the accused did the act or made the omission charged against him.

4

If as respects that count or any of those counts the jury is not so satisfied, it shall return a verdict of acquittal as if on the count in question the trial had proceeded to a conclusion.

F55

Where the question of fitness to be tried was determined after arraignment of the accused, the determination under paragraph (2) is to be made by the jury by whom he was being tried.

Procedure in relation to finding of insanity50

C2C41

Where upon the trial on indictment of any person charged with the commission of an offence—

a

F6oral evidence of a medical practitioner appointed for the purposes of Part II by F7RQIA and on the written or oral evidence of one other medical practitioner is given that the person charged was an insane person at the time the offence was committed; and

b

the jury finds that although the person charged did the act or made the omission charged, he was an insane person at that time,

the court shall direct a finding to be recorded to the effect that the person is not guilty of the offence charged on the ground of insanity.

Paras. (2), (3) rep by 1996 NI 24

4

In this Article “insane person” and “insanity” have the meanings assigned by section 1 of the [1966 c. 20 (N.I.)] Criminal Justice Act (Northern Ireland) 1966.