Commission Decision
of 24 July 2008
approving the emergency vaccination plans against bluetongue of certain Member States and fixing the level of the Community’s financial contribution for 2007 and 2008
(notified under document number C(2008) 3757)
(Only the Czech, Danish, Dutch, French, German, Italian, Portuguese and Spanish texts are authentic)
(2008/655/EC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,
Having regard to Council Directive 2000/75/EC of 20 November 2000 laying down specific provisions for the control and eradication of bluetongue, and in particular Article 9(2) thereof,
OJ L 327, 22.12.2000, p. 74. Directive as last amended by Commission Decision 2007/729/EC (OJ L 294, 13.11.2007, p. 26).
Having regard to Council Decision 90/424/EEC of 26 June 1990 on expenditure in the veterinary field, and in particular Article 3(3), (4) and the second indent of (5) thereof,
OJ L 224, 18.8.1990, p. 19. Decision as last amended by Decision 2006/965/EC (OJ L 397, 30.12.2006, p. 22).
Whereas:
(1) In 2007 outbreaks of bluetongue have occurred in several Member States, and more particularly bluetongue serotype 8 in Belgium, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Germany, Spain, France, Luxembourg, the Netherlands and bluetongue serotype 1 in France, Spain and Portugal. In 2008 outbreaks of bluetongue serotype 8 occurred for the first time in Italy.
(2) Bluetongue is a vector-borne disease, for which slaughter of animals of susceptible species is not in general an appropriate measure except in the case of animals clinically affected with bluetongue. The emergence of this disease may represent a serious risk to the Community’s livestock population.
(3) Commission Regulation (EC) No 1266/2007 of 26 October 2007 on implementing rules for Council Directive 2000/75/EC as regards the control, monitoring, surveillance and restrictions on movements of certain animals of susceptible species in relation to bluetongue was adopted by the Commission in order to demarcate the restricted zones, including the protection and surveillance zones, and set out the conditions governing movements of animals from these zones.
OJ L 283, 27.10.2007, p. 37. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 708/2008 (OJ L 197, 25.7.2008, p. 18).
(4) Vaccination is the most efficient veterinary measure that may be used to fight bluetongue, and a mass emergency vaccination campaign is the best option to achieve the objectives of reducing clinical disease and losses, containing the spread of the disease, protecting free territories in the Member States and facilitating safe trade in live animals. The vaccination of animals against bluetongue in the Member States concerned should therefore be approved in accordance with Article 9(2) of Directive 2000/75/EC.
(5) Vaccination against a particular bluetongue serotype has to be considered an emergency measure when it is implemented for the first time in a territory after the incursion of a new serotype. However, subsequent vaccination campaigns against the same serotype in the same territories are not anymore to be considered as emergency measures but should be considered in the context of eradication programmes.
(6) In order to prevent the spread of the disease as rapidly as possible, the Community should contribute financially to the eligible expenditure incurred by the Member States concerned in the context of the emergency measures taken to combat the disease, as provided for in Decision 90/424/EEC. Since the Community is not in a position to supply the vaccines, the purchase of the vaccine doses should be considered eligible expenditure.
(7) The Member States concerned have informed the Commission and the other Member States of the measures applied in accordance with the Community legislation to combat the recent outbreaks of bluetongue. Those Member States have presented their plans for emergency vaccination indicating the approximate number of vaccine doses to be used in 2007 and 2008 and the estimated costs of carrying out those vaccinations. The Commission has assessed these plans from both the veterinary and the financial point of view and the plans were found to comply with relevant Community veterinary legislation.
(8) Article 3(5) of Decision 90/424/EEC provides that the financial contribution from the Community must be 100 % of the cost of supply of the vaccine and 50 % of the costs incurred in carrying out the vaccination However, given the need to avoid excessive expenditure for the Community budget, maximum amounts must be established which reflect the reasonable payment for cost of supply of the vaccine and costs incurred in carrying out the vaccination. A reasonable payment is a payment for a material or a service at a proportionate price compared to the market price. Pending the results of any on-the-spot checks carried out by the Commission, it is now necessary to approve specific financial contribution from the Community to the Member States concerned and fix the amount for payment of the first instalment of the Community financial contribution.
(9) The Community financial contribution is to be paid on the basis of the official request for reimbursement submitted by Member States and supporting documents referred to in Article 7 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 349/2005 of 28 February 2005 laying down rules on the Community financing of emergency measures and of the campaign to combat certain animal diseases under Council Decision 90/424/EEC.
OJ L 55, 1.3.2005, p. 12.
(10) Under Council Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005 of 21 June 2005 on the financing of the common agricultural policy, programmes for veterinary emergency measures undertaken in accordance with Community rules are to be financed under the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund. For financial control purposes, Articles 9, 36 and 37 of that Regulation are to apply.
OJ L 209, 11.8.2005, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 479/2008 (OJ L 148, 6.6.2008, p. 1).
(11) The financial contribution from the Community should be subject to the condition that the actions planned are efficiently carried out and that the competent authorities supply all the necessary information within the time limits laid down in this Decision.
(12) For reasons of administrative efficiency, all expenditure submitted for a financial contribution by the Community should be expressed in euros. In accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005, the conversion rate for expenditure in a currency other than the euro should be the most recent exchange rate set by the European Central Bank prior to the first day of the month in which the application is submitted by the Member State concerned.
(13) The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health,
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION: