Article 27Initial reporting — derogations
1.In accordance with the models in Annexes IV and V, Member States shall report to the Commission any irregularity which has been the subject of a primary administrative or judicial finding in the progress or final reports on implementation of the annual programmes.
The report shall indicate:
(a)the Fund, the annual programme and the project concerned;
(b)the provision which has been infringed;
(c)the date and the source of the first information leading to suspicion that an irregularity has been committed;
(d)the practices employed in committing the irregularity;
(e)where appropriate, whether the practice gives rise to a suspicion of fraud;
(f)the manner in which the irregularity was discovered;
(g)the amount of the Community contribution concerned.
However, the following cases need not be reported, except in cases of suspected fraud:
(a)cases where the irregularities relate to amounts of less than EUR 10 000 chargeable to the general budget of the European Communities;
(b)cases where the irregularity consists solely of failure to implement, in whole or in part, a project included in the annual programme owing to the bankruptcy of the final beneficiary;
(c)cases brought to the attention of the responsible authority by the final beneficiary voluntarily and before detection by the responsible authority, whether before or after payment of the public contribution;
(d)cases detected and corrected by the responsible authority before any payment of the public contribution to the final beneficiary and before inclusion of the expenditure concerned in a declaration of expenditure submitted to the Commission.
2.At the request of the Commission, Member States shall in all cases give further details concerning:
(a)where appropriate, the other Member States and third countries involved;
(b)the period during which, or the moment at which, the irregularity was committed;
(c)the national authorities or bodies which drew up the official report on the irregularity and the authorities responsible for the administrative or judicial follow-up;
(d)the date on which the primary administrative or judicial finding on the irregularity was established;
(e)the identity of the natural and legal persons involved or of any other participating entities, except where this information is irrelevant for the purposes of combating irregularities, given the nature of the irregularity concerned;
(f)the total budget and the public contribution approved for the project and the distribution of its co-financing between the Community and national contributions;
(g)the amount of the public contribution affected by the irregularity and the corresponding Community contribution at risk;
(h)where no payment of the public contribution referred to under point (g) has been made to the persons or other entities identified, the amounts which would have been unduly paid had the irregularity not been identified;
(i)the suspension of payments, where applicable, and the possibilities of recovery;
(j)the nature of the irregular expenditure.
3.Where some of the information referred to in paragraph 2, in particular on the practices employed in committing the irregularity and on the manner in which the irregularity was discovered, is not available, Member States shall as far as possible supply the missing information when forwarding subsequent reports of irregularities to the Commission.